Vol. 43, Issue 1, 2015January 28, 2019 EDT
“The Perfect is the Enemy of the Good:” The Case for Proportionality Rules Instead of Guidelines in Civil E-Discovery
“The Perfect is the Enemy of the Good:” The Case for Proportionality Rules Instead of Guidelines in Civil E-Discovery
Articles in Vol. 43, Issue 1, 2015
Vol. 43, Issue 1, 2015
- Essay: The Two Faces of AnonymityAlex Kozinski
- Salinas v. Texas: The Fifth Amendment Self-Incrimination BurdenMatthew J. Thompson Jr.
- A Proposal to the ABA: Integrating Legal Writing and Experiential Learning into a Required Six-Semester Curriculum that Trains Students in Core Competencies, 'Soft' Skills, and Real-World JudgementAdam LamparelloCharles E. MacLean
- Answering the Call: Flipping the Classroom to Prepare Practice-Ready AttorneysAlex Berrio Matamoros
- "The Perfect is the Enemy of the Good:" The Case for Proportionality Rules Instead of Guidelines in Civil E-DiscoveryLeah M. Wolfe
- The Search for Meaning in the Notice Requirements of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: A 30 for 30 ShortJohnny Parker
- Avoiding Unintended Disclosure: Representing Clients with HIV and AIDSLaShanda Taylor Adams
Leah M. Wolfe, “The Perfect Is the Enemy of the Good:” The Case for Proportionality Rules Instead of Guidelines in Civil E-Discovery, 43 Capital University Law Review 153 (2019).