Skip to main content
Capital University Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Administrative Law
    • Advertising Regulation
    • Arbitration
    • Bankruptcy
    • Business Associations
    • Children & Family
    • Civil Rights
    • Constitutional Law & Criminal Procedure
    • Criminal Law & Criminal Justice
    • Cyber Security
    • Economic Regulation
    • Environmental
    • Estates & Trusts
    • Health & Healthcare
    • Immigration & Nationalization
    • Intellectual Property
    • International
    • Introductions & Dedications
    • Judges & Courts
    • Labor & Employment
    • Legal Education
    • Legislation
    • Oil, Gas & Mineral
    • Personal Injury/General Tort
    • Professional Responsibility
    • Rules of Evidence & Civil Procedure
    • Social Security/Disability
    • Tax
    • Teaching Law
    • Technology
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:19994/feed
Rules of Evidence & Civil Procedure
Vol. 43, Issue 1, 2015January 28, 2019 EDT

“The Perfect is the Enemy of the Good:” The Case for Proportionality Rules Instead of Guidelines in Civil E-Discovery

Leah M. Wolfe,
proportionality frameworkfederal rules of civil proceduree-discovery
Photo by Alexandre Debiève on Unsplash
Capital University Law Review
Leah M. Wolfe, “The Perfect Is the Enemy of the Good:” The Case for Proportionality Rules Instead of Guidelines in Civil E-Discovery, 43 Capital University Law Review 153 (2019).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system