Vol. 46, Issue 4, 2018March 20, 2019 EDT
Legislating Against Hate: Why Ohio’s Hate Crime Statute, and the Sentencing Enhancements that Support it, Cannot Remedy Institutional Problems and Continued Bigotry
Legislating Against Hate: Why Ohio’s Hate Crime Statute, and the Sentencing Enhancements that Support it, Cannot Remedy Institutional Problems and Continued Bigotry
Articles in Vol. 46, Issue 4, 2018
Vol. 46, Issue 4, 2018
- A Single Spark can Start a Prairie Fire: Implications of the 2015 Amendments to IEEE-SA's Patent PolicyAshish BharadwajManveen Singh
- Here Come Many More Mail-Order Brides: Why IMBRA Fails Women Escaping the Russian FederationChristina L. Pollard
- Legislating Against Hate: Why Ohio's Hate Crime Statute, and the Sentencing Enhancements that Support it, Cannot Remedy Institutional Problems and Continued BigotrySarah Ingles
- The Pervasion of Cell Phones and the Fourth Amendment: A Right to Privacy in Locational DataZachary R. Hoover
- The Americans with Disabilities Act: Legal and Practical Applications in Child Protection ProceedingsJoshua B. Kay
Sarah Ingles, Legislating Against Hate: Why Ohio’s Hate Crime Statute, and the Sentencing Enhancements That Support It, Cannot Remedy Institutional Problems and Continued Bigotry, 46 Capital University Law Review 701 (2019).