Skip to main content
Capital University Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Administrative Law
    • Advertising Regulation
    • Arbitration
    • Bankruptcy
    • Business Associations
    • Children & Family
    • Civil Rights
    • Constitutional Law & Criminal Procedure
    • Criminal Law & Criminal Justice
    • Cyber Security
    • Economic Regulation
    • Environmental
    • Estates & Trusts
    • Health & Healthcare
    • Immigration & Nationalization
    • Intellectual Property
    • International
    • Introductions & Dedications
    • Judges & Courts
    • Labor & Employment
    • Legal Education
    • Legislation
    • Oil, Gas & Mineral
    • Personal Injury/General Tort
    • Professional Responsibility
    • Rules of Evidence & Civil Procedure
    • Social Security/Disability
    • Tax
    • Teaching Law
    • Technology
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:3964/feed
Criminal Law & Criminal Justice
Vol. 46, Issue 4, 2018March 20, 2019 EDT

Legislating Against Hate: Why Ohio’s Hate Crime Statute, and the Sentencing Enhancements that Support it, Cannot Remedy Institutional Problems and Continued Bigotry

Sarah Ingles,
criminal law and procedurestatutory reformlegislationhate-crimecriminal justice
Photo by niu niu on Unsplash
Capital University Law Review
Sarah Ingles, Legislating Against Hate: Why Ohio’s Hate Crime Statute, and the Sentencing Enhancements That Support It, Cannot Remedy Institutional Problems and Continued Bigotry, 46 Capital University Law Review 701 (2019).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system