Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Capital University Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Advertising Regulation
    • Arbitration
    • Bankruptcy
    • Business Associations
    • Children & Family
    • Civil Rights
    • Constitutional Law & Criminal Procedure
    • Criminal Law & Criminal Justice
    • Cyber Security
    • Economic Regulation
    • Environmental
    • Estates & Trusts
    • Health & Healthcare
    • Immigration & Nationalization
    • Intellectual Property
    • International
    • Introductions & Dedications
    • Judges & Courts
    • Labor & Employment
    • Legal Education
    • Legislation
    • Oil, Gas & Mineral
    • Personal Injury/General Tort
    • Professional Responsibility
    • Rules of Evidence & Civil Procedure
    • Social Security/Disability
    • Tax
    • Teaching Law
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search

    Sorry, something went wrong. Please try your search again.
    ×

    • Articles
    • Blog posts

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://www.capitallawreview.org/feed
×
Teaching Law
Vol. 42, Issue 1, 2014January 30, 2019 EDT

A Writing Revolution: Using Legal Writing’s “Hobble” to Solve Legal Education’s Problem

Kristen Konrad Tiscione,
legal education legal writing teaching strategies teaching law writing
Photo by Green Chameleon on Unsplash
Capital University Law Review
Kristen Konrad Tiscione, A Writing Revolution: Using Legal Writing’s “Hobble” to Solve Legal Education’s Problem, 42 Capital University Law Review 143 (2019).
Save article as...▾
  • PDF
  • XML
  • Citation (BibTeX)

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system