Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Capital University Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Administrative Law
    • Advertising Regulation
    • Arbitration
    • Bankruptcy
    • Business Associations
    • Children & Family
    • Civil Rights
    • Constitutional Law & Criminal Procedure
    • Criminal Law & Criminal Justice
    • Cyber Security
    • Economic Regulation
    • Environmental
    • Estates & Trusts
    • Health & Healthcare
    • Immigration & Nationalization
    • Intellectual Property
    • International
    • Introductions & Dedications
    • Judges & Courts
    • Labor & Employment
    • Legal Education
    • Legislation
    • Oil, Gas & Mineral
    • Personal Injury/General Tort
    • Professional Responsibility
    • Rules of Evidence & Civil Procedure
    • Social Security/Disability
    • Tax
    • Teaching Law
    • Technology
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search

    Sorry, something went wrong. Please try your search again.
    ×

    • Articles
    • Blog posts

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://www.capitallawreview.org/feed
×
Constitutional Law & Criminal Procedure
Vol. 50, Issue 3, 2022November 13, 2022 EDT

Ears in the Sky: How the Technology of ShotSpotter is Eroding Fourth Amendment Protections

Gage Righter, J.D., Capital University Law School,
criminal procedure fourth amendment emerging technology gun shot reasonable suspicion high crime area police evidence
Photo by Tsvetoslav Hristov on Unsplash
Capital University Law Review
Gage Righter, Ears in the Sky: How the Technology of ShotSpotter Is Eroding Fourth Amendment Protections, 50 Capital University Law Review 321 (2022).
Save article as...▾
  • PDF
  • XML
  • Citation (BibTeX)

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system