Skip to main content
Capital University Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Administrative Law
    • Advertising Regulation
    • Arbitration
    • Bankruptcy
    • Business Associations
    • Children & Family
    • Civil Rights
    • Constitutional Law & Criminal Procedure
    • Criminal Law & Criminal Justice
    • Cyber Security
    • Economic Regulation
    • Environmental
    • Estates & Trusts
    • Health & Healthcare
    • Immigration & Nationalization
    • Intellectual Property
    • International
    • Introductions & Dedications
    • Judges & Courts
    • Labor & Employment
    • Legal Education
    • Legislation
    • Oil, Gas & Mineral
    • Personal Injury/General Tort
    • Professional Responsibility
    • Rules of Evidence & Civil Procedure
    • Social Security/Disability
    • Tax
    • Teaching Law
    • Technology
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:42874/feed
Rules of Evidence & Civil Procedure
Vol. 50, Issue 2, 2022November 08, 2022 EDT

Interstate Federalism Implications of a Uniform Code of State Civil Procedure: Lessons From the Draft of the Third Restatement of Conflict of Laws and Shady Grove

Glenn Koppel, J.D. Harvard Law School, B.A. City College of New York,
civil procedureconflict of lawsshady groveinterstatefederalismuniform
Photo by Joshua Sukoff on Unsplash
Capital University Law Review
Glenn Koppel, Interstate Federalism Implications of a Uniform Code of State Civil Procedure: Lessons From the Draft of the Third Restatement of Conflict of Laws and Shady Grove, 50 Capital University Law Review 191 (2022).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system