Vol. 44, Issue 2, 2016July 31, 2018 EDT
The Guards May Still Guard Themselves: An Analysis of how Kerry v. Din Further Entrenches the Doctrine of Consular Nonreviewability
The Guards May Still Guard Themselves: An Analysis of how Kerry v. Din Further Entrenches the Doctrine of Consular Nonreviewability
Articles in Vol. 44, Issue 2, 2016
Vol. 44, Issue 2, 2016
- Excuse in International LawArthur Kutoroff
- Reclaiming Economic Legacy: One Legal Strategy for a 2022 Fifa World Cup USAJeff ToddR. Todd Jewell
- The Guards May Still Guard Themselves: An Analysis of how Kerry v. Din Further Entrenches the Doctrine of Consular NonreviewabilityEmily C. CallanJohn Paul Callan
- Ohio's Dormant Mineral Act: Current and Unresolved IssuesAlexander McElroy
- Developing Adverse Possession of Severed Mineral Estates in OhioCody Smith
- Placing Power in the Cage of Law: Judicial independence in ChinaCaitlin E. Schultz
- The Gulf Coast Pipeline: A Stealthy Step Toward the Completion of the Keystone XL Pipeline ProjectLindsay M. Nelson
Emily C. Callan & John Paul Callan, The Guards May Still Guard Themselves: An Analysis of How Kerry v. Din Further Entrenches the Doctrine of Consular Nonreviewability, 44 Capital University Law Review 303 (2018).