Skip to main content
Capital University Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Administrative Law
    • Advertising Regulation
    • Arbitration
    • Bankruptcy
    • Business Associations
    • Children & Family
    • Civil Rights
    • Constitutional Law & Criminal Procedure
    • Criminal Law & Criminal Justice
    • Cyber Security
    • Economic Regulation
    • Environmental
    • Estates & Trusts
    • Health & Healthcare
    • Immigration & Nationalization
    • Intellectual Property
    • International
    • Introductions & Dedications
    • Judges & Courts
    • Labor & Employment
    • Legal Education
    • Legislation
    • Oil, Gas & Mineral
    • Personal Injury/General Tort
    • Professional Responsibility
    • Rules of Evidence & Civil Procedure
    • Social Security/Disability
    • Tax
    • Teaching Law
    • Technology
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:5071/feed
Children & Family
Vol. 44, Issue 1, 2016July 31, 2018 EDT

Ministerial Versus Discretionary Acts or Omissions in Child Welfare Litigation

Andrea MacIver, Daniel Pollack,
ministerialdiscretionarychild welfare systemschild welfarechildren and family
Photo by Jelleke Vanooteghem on Unsplash
Capital University Law Review
Andrea MacIver & Daniel Pollack, Ministerial Versus Discretionary Acts or Omissions in Child Welfare Litigation, 44 Capital University Law Review 103 (2018).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system