Vol. 45, Issue 1, 2017July 30, 2018 EDT
Misreading the Past: The Faulty Historical Basis Behind the Supreme Court’s Decision in District of Columbia v. Heller
Misreading the Past: The Faulty Historical Basis Behind the Supreme Court’s Decision in District of Columbia v. Heller
Articles in Vol. 45, Issue 1, 2017
Vol. 45, Issue 1, 2017
- Crossing Two Color Lines: Interracial Marriage and Residential Segregation in ChicagoDorothy E. Roberts
- Intimate Integration: Lessons from the LGBT Civil Rights MovementRobert S. Salem
- Interracial Marriage Litigation Foreshadows what the Obergefell Court Chose to AddressMark Strasser
- Reflections on the Persistence of Racial Segregation in HousingAlan C. Weinstein
- The Myth of the Absent SovereignThomas R. Laehn
- Misreading the Past: The Faulty Historical Basis Behind the Supreme Court's Decision in District of Columbia v. HellerCharles R. Mckirdy
- The Mascot Manifesto: Challenging the Constitutionality of Section 2(A) of The Lanham Act in a Heightened Era of Political CorrectnessZachary S. O'Driscoll
Charles R. Mckirdy, Misreading the Past: The Faulty Historical Basis Behind the Supreme Court’s Decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, 45 Capital University Law Review 107 (2018).