Skip to main content
Capital University Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Administrative Law
    • Advertising Regulation
    • Arbitration
    • Bankruptcy
    • Business Associations
    • Children & Family
    • Civil Rights
    • Constitutional Law & Criminal Procedure
    • Criminal Law & Criminal Justice
    • Cyber Security
    • Economic Regulation
    • Environmental
    • Estates & Trusts
    • Health & Healthcare
    • Immigration & Nationalization
    • Intellectual Property
    • International
    • Introductions & Dedications
    • Judges & Courts
    • Labor & Employment
    • Legal Education
    • Legislation
    • Oil, Gas & Mineral
    • Personal Injury/General Tort
    • Professional Responsibility
    • Rules of Evidence & Civil Procedure
    • Social Security/Disability
    • Tax
    • Teaching Law
    • Technology
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:27899/feed
Criminal Law & Criminal Justice
Vol. 48, Issue 4, 2020March 04, 2021 EDT

Youthful Indiscretion or Adult Disability? State v. Carnes and the Unconstitutional Use of a Juvenile Adjudication to Charge an Adult with Having Weapons While Under Disability in Ohio

Mackenzie Cutteridge,
juvenilejuvenile justice systemcarnesadjudicationweapons while under disabilityohio
Photo by Kentaro Toma on Unsplash
Capital University Law Review
Mackenzie Cutteridge, Youthful Indiscretion or Adult Disability? State v. Carnes and the Unconstitutional Use of a Juvenile Adjudication to Charge an Adult with Having Weapons While Under Disability in Ohio, 48 Capital University Law Review 589 (2021).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system