Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Capital University Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Advertising Regulation
    • Arbitration
    • Bankruptcy
    • Business Associations
    • Children & Family
    • Civil Rights
    • Constitutional Law & Criminal Procedure
    • Criminal Law & Criminal Justice
    • Cyber Security
    • Economic Regulation
    • Environmental
    • Estates & Trusts
    • Health & Healthcare
    • Immigration & Nationalization
    • Intellectual Property
    • International
    • Introductions & Dedications
    • Judges & Courts
    • Labor & Employment
    • Legal Education
    • Legislation
    • Oil, Gas & Mineral
    • Personal Injury/General Tort
    • Professional Responsibility
    • Rules of Evidence & Civil Procedure
    • Social Security/Disability
    • Tax
    • Teaching Law
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search

    Sorry, something went wrong. Please try your search again.
    ×

    • Articles
    • Blog posts

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://www.capitallawreview.org/feed
×
Criminal Law & Criminal Justice
Vol. 48, Issue 2, 2020May 19, 2020 EDT

Informants v. Innocents: Informant Testimony and its Contribution to Wrongful Convictions

Melanie B. Fessinger, Brian H. Bornstein, Jeffrey S. Neuschatz, Danielle DeLoach, Megan A. Hillgartner, Stacy A. Wetmore, Amy Bradfield Douglass,
psycholegal research wrongful conviction innocence project informant testimony informant
Photo by Emiliano Bar on Unsplash
Capital University Law Review
Melanie B. Fessinger et al., Informants v. Innocents: Informant Testimony and Its Contribution to Wrongful Convictions, 48 Capital University Law Review 149 (2020).
Save article as...▾
  • PDF
  • XML
  • Citation (BibTeX)

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system