This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
Capital University Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Administrative Law
    • Advertising Regulation
    • Arbitration
    • Bankruptcy
    • Business Associations
    • Children & Family
    • Civil Rights
    • Constitutional Law & Criminal Procedure
    • Criminal Law & Criminal Justice
    • Cyber Security
    • Economic Regulation
    • Environmental
    • Estates & Trusts
    • Health & Healthcare
    • Immigration & Nationalization
    • Intellectual Property
    • International
    • Introductions & Dedications
    • Judges & Courts
    • Labor & Employment
    • Legal Education
    • Legislation
    • Oil, Gas & Mineral
    • Personal Injury/General Tort
    • Professional Responsibility
    • Rules of Evidence & Civil Procedure
    • Social Security/Disability
    • Tax
    • Teaching Law
    • Technology
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:30262/feed
Constitutional Law & Criminal Procedure
Vol. 47, Issue 4, 2019December 01, 2019 EDT

Ohio’s 2004 Super-DOMA: Popular Constitutionalism and Normalization in the Marriage. Equality Debate

William N. Eskridge Jr.,
family lawmarriagedomasconstitutionconstitutional law
Photo by Kon Karampelas on Unsplash
Capital University Law Review
William N. Eskridge Jr., Ohio’s 2004 Super-DOMA: Popular Constitutionalism and Normalization in the Marriage. Equality Debate, 47 Capital University Law Review 695 (2019).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system